If an MRI makes a bunch of strange sonic vibrations but no one records it, does it make a sound?

If an MRI makes a bunch of strange sonic vibrations but no one records it, does it make a sound?

These are the top five things I wish I could do with music today. Right now. I’m going to find a way to do them some day.

  1. Go on tour with Meat Coma. It would be amazingly fun and we might never make it back to civilization.
  2. Record the hour of sounds that I heard when I had my MRI and use it to make an entire solo album mixed with guitar, bass, and cello riffs.
  3. Record at Soma Studios with John McEntire. He offered to give me a tour sometime, so I need to take him up on that.
  4. Start a post/math/space/surf-rock band with instruments no one has ever played before
  5. Write a Piano Trio

Photo by get directly down on Flickr.

It dawned on me this morning. The biggest trouble that I have with social media is sorting through the sea of information. Whether it’s Facebook, Twitter, Google Reader, or any other stream of networked posts and status updates, it’s easy to get overloaded by a mass of diverse topics presented by various voices. I immediately thought about my parents and how they have been slowly getting into social media, starting with Yahoo! then Facebook. I wonder… if I have trouble- as someone who has grown up with computers and used them since I was five, owned a Palm in college, a Windows Mobile user, social media enthusiast, etc.- then what about people who are “on the fringe” (so to speak) of SM? There definitely are those who get frustrated with their experiences, despite a reasonable amount of effort to make it work. I think about not only all of the time it’s taken me to sort through information but also to organize it in a way that makes sense to me, and I realize what a tremendous effort I’ve had to undertake! Sorting through information is truly a life-skill that starts developing in childhood and eventually extends into many aspects of adult life.

Not exaclty social media, but unreasonably complicated nonetheless

Not exaclty social media, but unreasonably complicated nonetheless

I am a huge proponent of user interface (UI). This interest partially developed from my experience with Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) software: Pro Tools is the industry standard but I also use Digital Performer. To me, the UI is the final frontier in technology, and ultimately what determines much or most of the success of a product. Features are great, but if you can’t use it easily who really cares enough to commit to using it? Probably only a niche, and if you have a niche product (and the niche can accept an un-refined UI) then that’s fine. But for the “average” technology user, it’s gotta be easy to use. Our lives are busy enough that sure we maybe smart enough to figure it out, but we’ll lose attention if it doesn’t happen with a certain amount of ease. I don’t know a whole lot about Facebook Lite but I would have to imagine that the creation of this variation to the main site is closely related to some of these thoughts. I have to admit, I kind of prefer it to the normal Facebook UI sometimes….

Everyone has their own personal tolerance level with “ease of use.” I think this is where some of the generational gap that I am proposing comes in. I would include other social, lifestyle, economic, and more factors in holistic view.

I know that for companies the balance between UI and feature-set is always in question, or it should be. I think that in many cases, features seem to take precedence over UI, and I am sure this contributes to some failure of social media sites.

Random though: If I was the mouse in Dumbo, able to induce the power of suggestion to leaders in social media while they were in REM sleep, I whisper in their ears to tell them to seek a better balance and offer options to allow for a more broad range of users. Finding the right option is another issue…

Image by StephenVanDyke on Flickr

Photo by ConspiracyofHappiness on Flickr

Photo by ConspiracyofHappiness on Flickr

As a Cubs fan, 2009 has been a year of injury and mediocrity. you know it’s not good when one of your highest-paid players is suspended for the rest of the season by management and the Chicago press is looking forward to 2010 with more than two weeks left in the season. As a MLB fan, it has been… well, a bit boring honestly. We basically know who is going to the playoffs. In fact, when I originally sat down to write this post, it was looking pretty bleak for any last minute regular season drama.

Thank God for the Twins!

[I should also be thanking the Vikings and Packers for giving MLB fans one extra day as well!]

OK, so I’m a Cubs fan. I root for the underdog. It’s just boring to watch the Yankees win 100 games with their huge paychecks. Manny Ramirez is good, but he’s not likable and hardly someone to root for. The Phillies and Rockies are much more interesting to watch because they’re far from perfect but manage to keep winning. The Twins, however, would be the undisputed underdogs of the playoffs, but one of the most exciting teams to watch play. There’s a nice balance unlike teams such as the 2005 Padres or the 1981 Royals who had basically no chance of winning a single playoff game, let alone a pennant or championship. The Twins are fighting for their lives since August and you can tell they mean business. They make me wish I’d been paying more attention all season long!

banner drawing of Harmon Killebrew that hangs in the Humphreydome

Photo by ConspiracyofHappiness on Flickr

I remember watching the 1991 World Series with Kirby Puckett, although I was young enough to not appreciate the MVP pitching performance by Jack Morris. The game 6 homer by Kirby Puckett seemed so much more exciting. It would be great to see Joe Mauer and Scott Baker in those roles. Even so, I am just glad that they have kept things interesting to the last moment when football is taking over the sports world and baseball might normally seem a distant second.

While over-preparing for a recent appointment, I received a great piece of advice. My imminent meeting was with a Vice President whom I had never met before and about whom I knew very little. I was able to find a short biography that gave me some hints about their possible character and some facts that didn’t reveal much about their personality. I was left with very little information to prepare me for the likely dynamics of this one-on-one.

Speaker Pelosi meets with Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang, both seated with hands in lap

Speaker Pelosi meets with Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang

The advice came in the form of a story of regret. The person was very intimidated by a high-level manager and was uncomfortable in their interactions with this superior. When the time came for this person to leave their current position and help find their successor, they didn’t approach this manager about the subject but instead relied on their co-workers to aid in this process. In the end they were very unhappy with the changes that were made after their tenure. Years later after the manager retired, the person heard many accounts of how easy to work with and approachable the presumed-to-be-intimidating manager had been over the years. Had the right conversations taken place and better influences occurred, the changes in the organization might have been more favorable in this person’s eyes. They regretted not taking action based on their presumption about the manager’s character.

This story was stuck in the back of my mind on the day of my meeting and I would daresay that it helped me relax a tad more, worry less about who the credentials of person on the other side of the table, and focus on what was actually happening: a meeting between two people with mutual interests and goals.

The next time you have a crucial meeting, possibly with an intimidating partner or client (or just a person with a mile-long title that barely fits on their business card) try to focus on the issues instead of the person in your preparation and I am positive that you’re more likely to feel good about the meeting afterward.

At the 'helm' of the MacMini and recording equipment

At the 'helm' of the MacMini and recording equipment

I did a short recording session with the best punk band in Indiana, the Psycho Nubs, back on June 7th. This week was catch-up time. Now that my summer class was over, I had no real excuse to procrastinate any longer. Wednesday evening was about 60-90 minutes polishing off the bass tracks for the four new songs, then I spent another 2-3 hours remixing and listening to mixes on my lovely ATM-H50 headphones, computer speakers, and in the car. I’m always amazed by how different songs can sound moving from one system to another. Something can jump right out on one set of speakers then be barely audible on another. That’s the art of mixing and also why it’s so fun!

Oddly enough, I keep thinking how ironic it is that this recording sounds the best of the three that we’ve collaborated on so far. Given the fact that my equipment is slimmed down and I don’t have all of the access to mics and preamps that I did while working on Sweetwater, I was a bit cautious going into this recording, and explained to the guys that it would have to sound a certain way. Previously, I’d discussed with them about how we wanted it to sound and compared to other recordings that we liked. In some ways, using less gear was to my advantage, especially with the guitars and bass.

I can’t wait to share this with folks once it’s done! The Nubs will have some cool stuff up their sleeves coming up, but I don’t want to burst the bubble on their plans, so keep an eye on them. Special thanks to Sophie for letting me use her Disney Princess sleeping bag to deaden sound in my garage!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

blochhead is a twit

Steal this book, er Web site...?

Enjoyed by

  • 1,545 wonderful human beings